Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:15

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
FDA rolls out AI tool agency-wide, weeks ahead of schedule - statnews.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Andy Bogard's Fatal Fury: City of the Wolves gameplay trailer revealed, releases June 24 - EventHubs
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Alex Cooper Alleges She Was Sexually Harassed by College Soccer Coach - Variety
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Why is Trump so disliked worldwide?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
When sharing a wife, is it best with your buddy or a stranger?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
The Best Time to Take Vitamin D for Maximum Absorption, According to Health Experts - Yahoo
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.